Monday, October 31, 2011

Fr. Reid's Homily for Yesterday - 31st Sunday of Ordinary Time - Year A

Folks,

The Scripture Readings for October 30, 2011 include Malachi 1:14-2:10; Psalm 131:1-3; 1st Thessalonians 2:7-13; and Matthew 23:1-12. The homily of Father Reid at St. Ann's Catholic Church in Charlotte, NC for the 31st Sunday in Ordinary Time – Year A follows. His is by far the best preaching from a Roman Catholic parish priest that I have yet read or heard.

Several years ago I was standing in line at a coffee shop when I noticed a group of 4 young men eyeballing me very seriously as if they were debating whether or not to speak to me.

Because the Roman collar is a powerful symbol, I think most priests find that we often provoke a reaction in people wherever we go. Most times it’s a smile or a nod of deference, but occasionally it’s a sneer or look of disdain.

These particular guys in the coffee shop were not smiling, and as I overheard their conversation I quickly realized that they were probably some type of fundamentalist or evangelical Christians looking to debate.

Just as I was handed my coffee, one of the young men asked me if I was a Catholic priest. When I answered affirmatively, he then asked: “So why do you go by ‘Father’ if our Lord tells us in Matthew 23 to “call no one on earth your father”?

I, in turn, asked him, “What do you call the man who cooperated with your mother to create you?” – pointing out that Jesus was speaking metaphorically and not literally here. And thus ensued a 45-minute conversation on all their misconceptions about Catholicism.

Unfortunately, at the end of it, I was unable to sway their thinking, for they were convinced that the only authority any Christian should ever turn to is Scripture, and Scripture alone.

While Catholics certainly venerate Sacred Scripture as an authority of greatest importance, we also realize that the constant teaching Tradition of the Church is important too.

Moreover, we believe that while Holy Mother Church may never teach anything contrary to what is found in Sacred Scripture, only Holy Mother Church has the authority to interpret Sacred Scripture properly. Christ gave this authority only to the one, holy, catholic, and apostolic church.

The very beautiful thing about those 4 young men I encountered in that coffee shop was that they recognized God’s sovereignty, and they very clearly were trying to subject themselves to Him in order to be saved.

Their mistake was that they failed to recognize the very instrument our Lord left in place on earth as a means of continuing His saving mission. They failed to recognize the historical fact that Jesus founded a Church to whom He gave the authority to teach in His name.

They failed to remember how our Lord told Simon Peter that he was the rock upon whom He would found this Church, and how the gates of hell would never prevail against the Church because He would send the Holy Spirit to guide her always.

Thus, we know that the Church has an undeniable authority, for it is She who, by God’s design, exercises His authority on earth.

Today’s readings raise this important issue of authority. In the first line of the first reading today, our Lord says: “A great King am I and my name will be feared among the nations.”

And in the Gospel Jesus speaks to His disciples and the crowds about divine authority.

Jesus tells them not to be called ‘Rabbi’, for there is but one teacher. They are told to call no man on earth ‘father,’ for there is but one Father in Heaven. And Jesus tells them not to be called ‘Master,’ for there is but one master – and it is Christ – and Christ is King.

In short, Jesus is calling the crowds to recognize the supreme authority of God, and He’s inviting them to place themselves under God’s sovereignty. As such, these readings call us to examine who or what it is we worship.

It is the nature of man to worship. God has created us in such a way that we are hard-wired, so to speak, to give honor and homage to something. We see this tendency to worship displayed in every culture throughout history.

Sadly, in our brokenness, man sometimes tends to worship himself rather than God. Indeed, this is how the ancient serpent tempted Adam and Eve in the Garden so long ago.

He tempted them to eat of the fruit of the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil by promising them that they would become like gods. Thus it was that he duped them, and we all now bear the terrible punishment for this disordered desire in our first parents.

But while Adam and Eve brought sin and death upon mankind, Jesus (the new Adam) – who was born of Mary (the new Eve) – brought life and salvation to mankind through His suffering, death, and resurrection.

Because of this, we call Christ our King. But His kingship is not like that of earthly kings. Christ’s kingship is a spiritual sovereignty, not a coercive sovereignty. His sovereignty is a gentle invitation to holiness – an invitation that must be accepted if we hope to go to Heaven.

Indeed, becoming holy by imitating Jesus in every aspect of our lives is not only the way that we place ourselves under His authority, but it is also the very best homage that we can pay our Sovereign Lord.

Placing ourselves under Christ’s sovereignty also requires that we make ourselves subject to the authority of His Church. Indeed, the Church is not extraneous to our salvation; She is essential to our salvation.

The Catechism teaches that: "The Church in this world is the sacrament of salvation, the sign and the instrument of the communion of God and men" (CCC 780). This is because we know Christ through the Church who makes Him present to us even now.

As Catholics in America, we often have a tendency to think with a “me and Jesus” attitude, as if the Church doesn’t really matter much. But this is not a Catholic way of thinking at all, for without the Church, we do not have Christ present to us.

Salvation comes to us from Christ through the Church.

Thus, being loyal subjects to Christ our King means that we must also be the loving children of Holy Mother Church. This we do by living as good and faithful Catholics, following Her laws and teachings with integrity and being faithful to the Sacraments.

For when we follow the Church’s authentic teachings, when we submit ourselves to Her lovingly and obediently in every way, then we can have confidence that we are truly subjecting ourselves to the sovereignty of Christ our King.

My dear brothers and sisters, Christ our King is calling us today to worship Him, and Him alone. He is calling us to place ourselves under His authority. Let us do so by living lives of authentic holiness, and by living our Catholic faith with integrity.

Let us draw close to the bosom of Holy Mother Church, and trust that by doing so, our Lord, in His goodness and mercy, will protect us and save us as our King.

The Modern Holloween Scare

Folks,

A friend from St. Joseph the Worker Church in Burgaw, NC provided the attached placard which so accurate describes the modern Holloween Scare. I think, however, that the figure of those murdered in this country since the Roe v Wade decision by SCOTUS in 1973 is actually closer to 60 million.

For the children of Judah have done that which is evil in my sight, saith Yahweh: they have set their abominations in the house which is called by my name, to defile it. And they have built the high places of Topheth, which is in the valley of the son of Hinnom, to burn their sons and their daughters in the fire; which I commanded not, neither came it into my mind. Therefore, behold, the days come, saith Yahweh, that it shall no more be called Topheth, nor The valley of the son of Hinnom, but The valley of Slaughter: for they shall bury in Topheth, till there be no place to bury. And the dead bodies of this people shall be food for the birds of the heavens, and for the beasts of the earth; and none shall frighten them away. Then will I cause to cease from the cities of Judah, and from the streets of Jerusalem, the voice of mirth and the voice of gladness, the voice of the bridegroom and the voice of the bride; for the land shall become a waste. Jeremiah 7:30-34

The Occupying Fleabagger Miscreants

Folks,

Enough has been written exposing the Occupying Fleabagger Miscreants for what they are. Father Philip Neri Powell at Domine, Da Mihi Hanc Aquam has done an excellent expose of the hoodlums of iniquity supported by filthy rich corpulent millionaire of gelatinous excess, Michael Moore, and his ilk in the essay entitled, "OCCUPY! Coffee Bowl Browsing". More expose exists at The American Catholic blogsite:

Nothing New Under the Sun
I am Shocked! Shocked!!

A friend likewise noted on Facebook the antipathy that these thugs have against the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church:

Occupy Protesters Disrupt Catholic Mass in Vancouver

The news article reports

"I’m not asking you to renounce your religion," the crowd chanted in unison. "I’m asking you to stand with Jesus, and stand for what he stood for: justice, brotherhood, sisterhood and righting the wrongs of the past."

Justice is respect for the right of people to worship in peace. Brotherhood and sisterhood is respect for the private property owned by our brothers and sisters, not desecrating it with feces and trash, and declaring unlawful occupation. Righting the wrongs of the past is getting our hearts right with the Lord, and that means overturning Roe v Wade and repealing so-called gay rights.

Unfortunately, too many parents in this last generation were so deceived by godless liberalism that they spared the rod and now the child is spoiled. Of course, such children are grown, but not their behavior, their morals or their sense of right and wrong. They continue to act like spoiled rotten brats who need a quick slap across the face and a swift kick in the behind. Alas, the Obama government, instead of giving them what they deserve (i.e., National Guardsmen armed with whips driving them out of their occupation), encourages them in their childish temper tantrums. However, at least in the Northeast, early winter snow will do what government is failing to do in protecting those who earn wealth and build up society. God's whip is going to be a whole lot nastier and exactly what these gangsters merit.

Nevertheless (now that I have finished my long-winded deprecation of this misbegotten refuse from the slimy, putrid pit of a civilization gone pagan) I will try to avoid further commentary thereon except for the truly significant. Spoiled brats don't deserve publicity, but rather a spanking in the closet and a mouth cleaned with soap and water.

Sunday, October 30, 2011

Fr. Reid's Homily for Last Weekend - 30th Sunday of Ordinary Time - Year A

Folks,

The following is Fr. Reid's homily for last weekend - 30th Sunday of Ordinary Time - Year A. The homily that I had listened to was preached by a visiting priest on Saturday evening and did not at all reflect this. The visiting priest focused on the social justice justice issue of immigration because of the reading from Exodus. Father Reid, however, focused on the action of true justice in our lives and must have preached his homily at Sunday morning's Mass, which I am sorry to have missed. The Scripture readings for October 23rd included the following:

Exodus 22:20-26
Psalm 18:2-3, 3-4, 47, 51
1st Thessalonians 1:5c-10
Matthew 22:34-40

Aristotle once wrote that “our character is determined by our choosing good or evil, not by the opinions we hold” (cf. Nichomachean Ethics 3.2). In other words, actions speak louderthan words when it comes to character formation.

If we wish to be “good” people, then it is imperative to do what is right and good, not just know what is right and good.

Last week I spoke about striving to overcome temptation and sin in order to become that ideal person God desires us to be. We should choose to do what is right and good and thereby become this ideal person not simply for our own salvation, but also for God’s glory!

Today’s readings remind us that there’s another reason we should strive to become the best version of ourselves: viz., for the sake of other people.

All of us are necessarily in relationship with other persons. Whether we like it or not, our actions (and inactions) readily affect other people. None of us lives in a vacuum. And today’s readings speak about how our relationships with others should be governed.

Of course Jesus Himself reminds us in the Gospel today that we should love our neighbors as ourselves, while the Book of Exodus speaks to us of how we should deal with the poor, the needy, and less fortunate in our midst.

Thus, these two readings remind us of the importance of exercising the virtues of charity and justice with others. Today I’d like to focus a bit on these virtues, especially justice.

The word justice comes from the Latin root jus, which means “right” or “equitable.” Practicing justice requires that we treat people with fairness, not just courtesy.

Thus, the virtue of justice leads us to give people their proper due, to respect their rights: both their natural and legal rights as people, as well as the rights that arise from the obligations each of us has towards our family and friends.

Perhaps in theory this doesn’t sound too difficult, but the long docket of court cases in our society today, as well as the demonstrations, political uprisings, and wars in our world, show that justice often is lacking in human relationships – not to mention charity.

At this point in my life, I’ve been a priest long enough to witness many, many examples of human relationships of all sorts falling apart, and the devastation engendered by a lack of true justice within those relationships.

So many times marriages fail, families fall apart, and friends no longer speak because justice within a relationship is neglected and someone is not accorded the proper respect.

So how do we become truly just people so that our all of our relationships can be properly governed? Practicing justice relies on knowledge of the truth, and therefore practicing justice begins with the virtue of humility.

Humility is the virtue that enables us to see truth clearly, especially the truth about ourselves. Humility enables us to see ourselves as God sees us. Moreover, humility enables us to see that everything we have, every good quality we possess, is an unmerited gift from God.

So many of us today operate under a mistaken sense of entitlement. So many of us believe that we deserve all the successes we enjoy in this life because we’ve worked hard for them. And perhaps we have worked hard, which is good.

But the full truth is that God, in His great love, mercy, and solicitude, has given us every talent, every skill, and every positive character trait that has contributed to whatever successes we enjoy in this life. No one is a self-made man.

None of us can ever succeed in this life without God’s blessing or without God willing it. Sadly, so many of us are too blind to see this full truth, and when we are blind to the truth about ourselves, we are often blind to the truth about others as well.

Obviously, we are all in God’s debt. Therefore, it is right and just that we render Him our homage, our praise, our adoration, and our sincere gratitude. To neglect to worship, praise, and thank God is a serious sin and a terrible injustice.

While we can never repay God for His goodness to us, justice demands that treat Him with the greatest respect, loving Him with all our heart, all our soul, and all our mind in order for our relationship with Him to be properly ordered.

Coming to this understanding that it is our Lord who has given us every good thing should also help us to properly order our relationships with other people as well.

Specifically, if it is God who is responsible for every gift that man has, then all men are truly equal in dignity. Put another way, each of us is a beggar before God. While certainly some people are greater sinners than others, each of is in need of God’s mercy and forgiveness.

This absolute need for God’s mercy, the fact that none of us will be saved by our own merits, makes us all equal in God’s eyes – even the worst of sinners. As Christians, we must therefore look upon all people as worthy of love, respect, and compassion – for that’s how God sees us.

While I think most of us may ascent to this notion of the radical equality of all people in God’s eyes, in practice too many of us fall short in treating others, especially those closest to us, with the proper respect at times. We often fail to see others as worthy of our love.

When we lack humility, we do not always see the truth about ourselves and others, and in our lack of humility we sometimes feel justified in treating people badly. In our broken human nature, we are often inclined to think too highly of ourselves, and too little of others.

So many of the sins we commit against others: our petty judgments, our gossiping, our insults, our unwillingness to forgive, our lies, our cheating and stealing, even sins of violence come from this failure to acknowledge this fundamental equality of dignity.

Or we labor under the mistaken belief that because someone has harmed us or wronged us in some way, we therefore have the right to sin against them in turn, or at least withhold our forgiveness.

But the truth, my brothers and sisters, is that we are all sinners. Each and every one of us. Each of us is worthy of God’s love, and conversely, each of us is also deserving of His damnation for whatever sins we’ve committed. We are all spiritually sick; we are all broken.

We are all in need of God’s mercy. While it is true that some of us are greater sinners than others, true justice (tempered by charity and Christian wisdom) recognizes that none of us has a right to God’s mercy, and therefore none of has a right to withhold mercy from others.

And thus Jesus must be our model for how to treat others. Despite our terrible sinfulness – a sinfulness that is rendered all the more terrible when we consider all that God has done for us – Jesus was still willing to suffer and die for us so that we might be redeemed.

So, if we are going to call ourselves Christians, we must be willing to forgive the sins of others – even the most grievous of offenses – in order to treat people with justice and charity.

Hardness of heart, bitterness, and lack of forgiveness have no place in God’s Kingdom.

Therefore, let us all today examine ourselves well. Whom have we offended; to whom do we owe an apology? In justice let us take responsibility for our actions and do our best to make amends to all whom we’ve trespassed against.

And in charity, let us forgive all who have trespassed against us.

The True Philosophy

Folks,

Please place on your list of favorite web sites "The True Philosophy" blog of my friend, fellow engineer and Catholic apologist Jim McCrea.

"The true philosophy is within the Faith tradition of Catholic Christianity, with the realism of St. Thomas Aquinas as its basis."

I have never met a man more knowledgeable in Catholic philosophy and theology than Jim McCrea. You may rely upon what he writes as orthodox.

Thanksgiving - 2022

Folks,

I received in my e-mail today the following fictitious projection about Thanksgiving in 2022. Sadly, under the leadership of Muslim-sympathizing Barack Hussein Obama in the Presidency and lesbian Elena Kagan in the Supreme Court, this may not turn out to be fiction at all. I fear for my children's future in such an Orwellian future of INGSOC.

*Thanksgiving 2022*

"Winston, come into the dining room, it's time to eat," Julia yelled to her husband. "In a minute, honey, it's a tie score," he answered. Actually Winston wasn't very interested in the traditional holiday football game between Detroit and Washington.

Ever since the government passed the Civility in Sports Statute of  2017, outlawing tackle football for its "unseemly violence" and the "bad example it sets for the rest of the world," Winston was far less of a football fan than he used to be. Two-hand touch wasn't nearly as exciting.

Yet it wasn't the game that Winston was uninterested in. It was more the thought of eating another Tofu Turkey. Even though it was the best type of Veggie Meat available after the government revised the American Anti-Obesity Act of 2018, adding fowl to the list of federally-forbidden foods, (which already included potatoes, cranberry sauce and mince-meat pie), it wasn't anything like real turkey. And ever since the government officially changed the name of "Thanksgiving Day" to "A National Day of Atonement" in 2020 to officially acknowledge the Pilgrims' historically brutal treatment of Native Americans, the holiday had lost a lot of its luster.

Eating in the dining room was also a bit daunting. The unearthly gleam of government-mandated fluorescent light bulbs made the Tofu Turkey look even weirder than it actually was, and the room was always cold. Ever since Congress passed the Power Conservation Act of 2016, mandating all thermostats-which were monitored and controlled by the electric company-be kept at 68 degrees, every room on the north side of the house was barely tolerable throughout the entire winter.

Still, it was good getting together with family. Or at least most of the family. Winston missed his mother, who passed on in October, when she had used up her legal allotment of live-saving medical treatment. He had had many heated conversations with the Regional Health Consortium, spawned when the private insurance market finally went bankrupt, and everyone was forced into the government health care program. And though he demanded she be kept on her treatment, it was a futile effort. "The RHC's resources are limited," explained the government bureaucrat Winston spoke with on the phone. "Your mother received all the benefits to which she was entitled. I'm sorry for your loss."

Ed couldn't make it either. He had forgotten to plug in his electric car last night, the only kind available after the Anti-Fossil Fuel Bill of 2021 outlawed the use of the combustion engines-for everyone but government officials. The fifty mile round trip was about ten miles too far, and Ed didn't want to spend a frosty night on the road somewhere between here and there.

Thankfully, Winston's brother, John, and his wife were flying in. Winston made sure that the dining room chairs had extra cushions for the occasion. No one complained more than John about the pain of sitting down so soon after the government-mandated cavity searches at airports, which severely aggravated his hemorrhoids. Ever since a terrorist successfully smuggled a cavity bomb onto a jetliner, the TSA told Americans the added "inconvenience" was an "absolute necessity" in order to stay "one step ahead of the terrorists." Winston's own body had grown accustomed to such probing ever since the government expanded their scope to just about anywhere a crowd gathered, via Anti-Profiling Act of 2022. That law made it a crime to single out any group or individual for "unequal scrutiny," even when probable cause was involved. Thus, cavity searches at malls, train stations, bus depots, etc., etc., had become almost routine. Almost.

The Supreme Court is reviewing the statute, but most Americans expect a Court composed of six progressives and three conservatives to leave the law intact. "A living Constitution is extremely flexible," said the Court's eldest member, Elena Kagan. " Europe has had laws like this one for years. We should learn from their example," she added.

Winston's thoughts turned to his own children. He got along fairly well with his 12-year-old daughter, Brittany, mostly because she ignored him. Winston had long ago surrendered to the idea that she could text anyone at any time, even during Atonement Dinner. Their only real confrontation had occurred when he limited her to 50,000 texts a month, explaining that was all he could afford. She whined for a week, but got over it.

His 16-year-old son, Jason, was another matter altogether. Perhaps it was the constant bombarding he got in public school that global warming, the bird flu, terrorism or any of a number of other calamities were "just around the corner," but Jason had developed a kind of nihilistic attitude that ranged between simmering surliness and outright hostility. It didn't help that Jason had reported his father to the police for smoking a cigarette in the house, an act made criminal by the Smoking Control Statute of 2018, which outlawed smoking anywhere within 500 feet of another human being. Winston paid the $5,000 fine, which might have been considered excessive before the American dollar became virtually worthless as a result of QE13. The latest round of quantitative easing the federal government initiated was, once again, to "spur economic growth." This time they promised to push unemployment below its years-long rate of 18%, but Winston was not particularly hopeful.

Yet the family had a lot for which to be thankful, Winston thought, before remembering it was a Day of Atonement. At least he had his memories. He felt a twinge of sadness when he realized his children would never know what life was like in the Good Old Days, long before government promises to make life "fair for everyone" realized their full potential. Winston, like so many of his fellow Americans, never realized how much things could change when they didn't happen all at once, but little by little, so people could get used to them.

He wondered what might have happened if the public had stood up while there was still time, maybe back around 2011, when all the real nonsense began. "Maybe we wouldn't be where we are today if we'd just said 'enough is enough' when we had the chance," he thought. Maybe so, Winston. Maybe so.

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Statistics: Fleabagger vs Teabagger

Folks,

My sister posted this table of statistics of Fleabagger vs Teabagger on her Facebook web page. One can be a socialist leach on society, or a patriotic citizen contributing his fair share.

An E-Mail on the Fleabaggers in the Occupy Wallstreet Movement

Folks,

I received the following from a long-time friend with whom I used to work at a commercial nuclear power plant a few decades below. We who actually work for a living are the 53% who pay taxes while the fleabaggers and those of their ilk are 99% of the problem.

Call it an occupational hazard, but I can't look at the Occupy Wall Street protesters without thinking, 'Who parented these people?' As a culture columnist, I've commented on the social and political ramifications of the 'movement' -- now known as 'OWS' -- whose fairyland agenda can be summarized by one of their placards: 'Everything for everybody.' Thanks to their pipe-dream platform, it's clear there are people with serious designs on 'transformational' change in America who are using the protesters like bedsprings in a brothel. Yet it's not my role as a commentator that prompts my parenting question, but rather the fact that I'm the mother of four teens and young adults. There are some crucial life lessons that the protesters' moms clearly have not passed along. Here, then, are five things the OWS protesters' mothers should have taught their children but obviously didn't, so I will: Life isn't fair. ... Nothing is 'free.' ... Your word is your bond. When you demonstrate to eliminate student loan debt, you are advocating precisely the lack of integrity you decry in others. ... A protest is not a party. ... There are reasons you haven't found jobs. The truth? Your tattooed necks, gauged ears, facial piercings and dirty dreadlocks are off-putting. Nonconformity for the sake of nonconformity isn't a virtue. Occupy reality: Only 4 percent of college graduates are out of work. If you are among that 4 percent, find a mirror and face the problem. It's not them. It's you.

The Republic can survive a Barack Obama, who is, after all, merely a fool. It is less likely to survive a multitude of fools such as those who made him their president.

Testimony of Most Reverend William C. Lori to the US Congressional Sub-Committee on the Constitution

Folks,

The following is Bishop William Lori's testimony before the US Congressional Sub-Committee on the Constitution. It is apparent from this testimony that the flagrant Constitutional violations of the current holder of the Oval Office make him and his godless Democrats with him singularly unworthy of holding office and wielding public authority. At all costs these evil persons of sexual depravity, idolatry and murder of the unborn must be excised from the body politic by every peaceful means possible in next November's election. The alternative may sadly be (as even Archbishop Timothy Dolan hinted at in previous declarations) civil war. I for one will NOT be ruled by that depraved man of iniquity in the Oval Office, or by his demonic minions of sexual sin and infanticide of the unborn.

Testimony of Most Reverend William C. Lori

Bishop of Bridgeport

On behalf of the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops

Before the Judiciary Committee of the United States House of Representatives, Subcommittee on the Constitution

October 26, 2011

Mr. Chairman and distinguished members of the Subcommittee, allow me to thank you for the invitation and opportunity to be with you today to offer testimony on religious liberty. Let me also express my appreciation to you for calling this hearing on a topic of fundamental importance to our Church and to our Nation.

I am here today representing the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB). I serve as Bishop of the Diocese of Bridgeport, and as the newly appointed Chair of the USCCB’s Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty. I will summarize my remarks and ask that my full written testimony be entered into the record.

I hope to address three topics today. First, I would like to offer a few brief reflections on the Catholic vision of religious freedom for all, as rooted in the inherent dignity of every human person, and this vision’s deep resonance with the American experiment. Second, I would like to identify certain threats to religious liberty that have emerged with particular urgency in America today. And third, I would urge you to action in support of particular legislative measures that would secure religious liberty against these threats.

I.

Religious liberty is not merely one right among others, but enjoys a certain primacy. As the Holy Father, Pope Benedict XVI recently explained: “It is indeed the first of human rights, not only because it was historically the first to be recognized but also because it touches the constitutive dimension of man, his relation with his Creator.” (Pope Benedict XVI, Address to Diplomatic Corps, 10 Jan. 2011.) The late Pope John Paul II taught that “the most fundamental human freedom [is] that of practicing one’s faith openly, which for human beings is their reason for living.”(Pope John Paul II, Address to Diplomatic Corps, 13 Jan. 1996, No. 9.) Not coincidentally, religious liberty is first on the list in the Bill of Rights, the charter ofour Nation’s most cherished and fundamental freedoms. The First Amendment begins: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof….” It is commonly, and with justice, called our “First Freedom.”

Religious liberty is also prior to the state itself. It is not merely a privilege that the government grants us and so may take away at will. Instead, religious liberty is inherent in our very humanity, hard-wired into each and every one of us by our Creator. Thus government has a perennial obligation to acknowledge an protect religious liberty as fundamental, no matter the moral and political trends of the moment. This insight as well is reflected in the laws and traditions of our country from its very inception. The Declaration of Independence boldly proclaimed as a self-evident truth that our inalienable rights are “endowed by our Creator”—not by the State. Religious freedom is most commonly understood as an individual right, and it certainly is that. Religious freedom proceeds from the dignity of each person, and so protects each person individually. “[T]he exercise of religion, of its very nature, consists before all else in those internal, voluntary and free acts whereby man sets the course of his life directly toward God” (Second Vatican Council, Dignitatis Humanae, No. 3). Therefore individuals are “not to be forced to act in manner contrary to [their] conscience,” nor “restrained from acting in accordance with [their] conscience.” (Ibid.) Congress has shown special vigilance in protecting these individual rights of conscience, for example, in the form of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), which forbids the federal government from imposing any “substantial burdens” on religious exercise absent the most compelling reasons.

But religious freedom also belongs to churches and other religious institutions, comprised of citizens who are believers and who seek, not to create a theocracy, but rather to influence their culture from within. The distinction between Church and State, between God and Caesar, remains “fundamental to Christianity” (Pope Benedict XVI, Deus Caritas Est, No. 28). We look to the State not to impose religion but to guarantee religious freedom, and to promote harmony among followers of different religions. The Church has “a proper independence and is structured on the basis of her faith as a community the State must recognize” (Ibid.). An indispensable element of this independence is the right of churches “not to be hindered, either by legal measures or by administrative action on the part of government, in the selection, training, appointment, and transferral of their own ministers” (Second Vatican Council, Dignitatis Humanae, No. 4). We are grateful that federal courts in the United States—at least to date—have uniformly recognized this core protection under the Religion Clauses of the First Amendment.

Finally, the Church teaches that these rights of religious freedom—prior to all other rights and even to the State, and protecting both individuals and institutions—are held not just by Catholics, but by all people, by virtue of their common humanity. Government has the duty “to assume the safeguard of the religious freedom of all its citizens, in an effective manner, by just laws and by other appropriate means” (Second Vatican Council, Dignitatis Humanae, No. 6 (emphasis added)). Even in societies where one particular religion predominates, it is “imperative that the right of all citizens and religious communities to religious freedom should be recognized and made effective in practice” (Ibid.). The United States stands strongly for the principle that these rights of freedom are also rights of equality—that government should not impose any special civil disadvantages or otherwise discriminate against its citizens based on religion. And although it may not have always lived up to this or other religious freedom principles in practice, our country’s unique capacity for self-correction has always provided avenues to repair to these principles that have made it a great nation.

II.

Regrettably, now is the time for such self-correction and repair. In the recent past, the Bishops of the United States have watched with increasing alarm as this great national legacy of religious liberty, so profoundly in harmony with our own teachings, has been subject to ever more frequent assault and ever more rapid erosion.

As I mentioned previously, I am the Chair of the USCCB’s new Ad Hoc Committee for Religious Liberty, which was instituted precisely to help resist these assaults and reverse this erosion. The Bishops of the United States decided in principle to institute a committee like this in June of this year, based on developments over the months and years preceding that date. That I am already appointed as Chair represents action at near light-speed in Church time, and attests to the urgency of the matter from the Bishops’ perspective.

Although the Bishops’ decision was based on facts arising before June, I am here today to call to your attention grave threats to religious liberty that have emerged even since June—grim validations of the Bishops’ recognition of the need for urgent and concerted action in this area. I focus on these because most of them arise under federal law, and so may well be the subject of corrective action by Congress.

In August, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued regulations to mandate the coverage of contraception (including abortifacients) and sterilization as “preventive services” in almost all private health insurance plans. There is an exception for certain religious employers; but to borrow from Sr. Carol Keehan of the Catholic Health Association, it is so incredibly narrow that it would cover only the “parish housekeeper.” And the exception does nothing to protect insurers or individuals with religious or moral objections to the mandate. The “preventive services” mandate is but the first instance of conscience problems arising from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act enacted in March 2010 – an act whose goal of greater access to health care the Bishops have long supported, but that we had persistently warned during the legislative process did not include sufficient protections for rights of conscience.

In May, HHS added a new requirement to its cooperative agreements and government contracts for services to victims of human trafficking and to refugees who are unaccompanied minors, so that otherwise highly qualified service providers, such as USCCB’s Migration and Refugee Services (MRS), will be barred from participation in the program because they cannot in conscience provide the “full range” of reproductive services—namely, abortion and contraception. This requirement is exactly what the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has urged HHS to adopt in a lawsuit challenging the constitutionality of MRS’s longstanding contract with HHS to serve victims of human trafficking. Ironically, ACLU has attacked the Church’s exemplary service to these victims as a violation of religious liberty. Already, HHS has taken its major program for serving trafficking victims away from MRS and transferred it to several smaller organizations that frankly may not be equipped to assume this burden.

The State Department’s U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is increasingly requiring contractors, such as Catholic Relief Services (CRS), to provide comprehensive HIV prevention activities (including condom distribution), as well as full integration of its programs with reproductive health activities (including provision of artificial contraception) in a range of international relief and development programs. Under this new requirement, of course, some of the most effective providers helping to prevent and treat AIDS in Africa and other developing nations will be excluded.

The federal Department of Justice (DoJ) has ratcheted up its attack on the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) by mischaracterizing it as an act of bigotry. As you may know, in March, DoJ stopped defending DOMA against constitutional challenges, and the Conference spoke out against that decision. But in July, the Department started filing briefs actively attacking DOMA’s constitutionality, claiming that supporters of the law could only have been motivated by bias and prejudice. If the label of “bigot” sticks to our Church and many other churches—especially in court, under the Constitution—because of their teaching on marriage, the result will be church-state conflicts for many years to come.

DoJ has also undermined religious liberty in the critically important “ministerial exception” case now pending before the Supreme Court, Hosanna Tabor v. EEOC. DoJ could have taken the position that the “ministerial exception,” though generally providing strong protection for the right of religious groups to choose their ministers without government interference, didn’t apply in the case before the court. This would be consistent with the uniform judgment of the federal Courts of Appeals for decades, as well the DoJ itself until now. Instead, DoJ needlessly attacked the very existence of the exception, in opposition to a vast coalition of religious groups urging its preservation through their amicus curiae briefs.

At the state level, religious liberty protections associated with the redefinition of marriage have fallen far short of what is necessary. In New York, county clerks face legal action for refusing to participate in same-sex unions, and gay rights advocates boast how little religious freedom protection individuals and groups will enjoy under the new law. In Illinois, Catholic Charities has been driven out of the adoption and foster care business, because it recognizes the unique value of man-woman marriage for the well-being of children.

III.

These are serious threats to religious liberty, and as I noted previously they represent only the most recent instances in a broader trend of erosion of religious liberty in the United States. The ultimate root causes of these threats are profound, and lie beyond the scope of this hearing or even this august body to fix—they are fundamentally philosophical and cultural problems that the bishops, and other participants in civil society, must address apart from government action. But we can—and must—also treat the symptoms immediately, lest the disease spread so quickly that the patient is overcome before the ultimate cure can be formulated and delivered.

As to the “preventive services” mandate, and related problems under the health care reform law, there are three important bipartisan bills currently in the Congress: the Protect Life Act (H.R. 358), the Abortion Non-Discrimination Act (H.R. 361), and the Respect for Rights of Conscience Act (H.R. 1179). All three go a long way toward guaranteeing religious liberty and freedom of conscience for religious employers, health insurers, and health care providers. United with my brother bishops, and in the name of religious liberty, I urge these three bills be swiftly passed by Congress so they may be signed into law. We welcome the fact that H.R. 358 was recently approved by the House in a bipartisan vote, and that the text of H.R. 361 has been included in the House subcommittee draft of the Labor/HHS appropriations bill for Fiscal Year 2012.

As to the illegal conditions that HHS and USAID are placing on religious providers of human services, this may call for a Congressional hearing or other form of investigation to ensure compliance with the applicable conscience laws, as well as to identify how these new requirements came to be imposed. Additional statutes may be appropriate, possibly to create new conscience protections, but more likely to create private rights of action for those whose rights under the existing protections have been violated. Unfortunately, the authority to enforce the applicable conscience protections now lies principally with the very federal agencies that may be violating the protections.

As to the attack on DOMA, this body should resist legislative efforts to repeal the law, including the Respect for Marriage Act (H.R. 1116). We also applaud the decision of the House to take up the defense of DOMA in court after DoJ abandoned it, and we urge you to sustain that effort for as long as necessary to obtain definitive confirmation of its constitutionality. Moreover, DoJ’s decisions to abandon both DOMA and the “ministerial exception” seem to warrant congressional inquiry. The religious freedom threats to marriage at the state level may fall beyond the scope of authority of Congress to control—except to the extent that state adoption and foster care services are federally funded. We believe this avenue for protecting the religious liberty of faith-based service providers should be explored more fully.

Thank you for your attention, and again, for your willingness to give religious freedom the priority it is due.

Commentary at The American Catholic on the Vatican's Recent Economic Paper

Folks,

There is commentary at The American Catholic web site on BOMFOG and “Towards Reforming the International Financial and Monetary Systems in the Context of Global Public Authority” that is worthy of the reader's interest. BOMFOG, for those who don't know, is the acronym for Nelson Rockefeller's idea of "The Brotherhood of Man under the Fatherhood of God!" The fact of the matter is that this will not occur until Jesus Christ returns in all His glory, and it won't be the Brotherhood of Mankind, but the Wedding Feast of the Lamb. The Bible is clear: only those whose names are written in the Lamb's Book of Life get into Paradise; the rest will have sent themselves to hell.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Virgins in Heaven

Folks,

I posted something similar to this before, but it nevertheless bears repeating. Much to the terrorists' surprise, the virgins awaiting them in Paradise were not quite what they expected. Thanks, Catawissa Gazetteer!

Riot Squads Clears Wall Street Occupiers in Two Cities - About Time

Folks,

Associated Press reports today that Riot Squads Clears Wall Street Occupiers in Two Cities (Atlanta, GA and Oakland, CA). It's about time! The filthy vermin that were cleared out left behind all manner of trash, feces, urine puddles, and other refuse. They banged their drums like Neanderthals all through the night, keeping parents and children awake with their ape-head noise-making, insisting ever so oxymoronicly that they are civilized. And for all their liberal concern over protecting the environment, they have done their best to destroy it wherever they decided to sit.

But this is exactly what we should expect for taking God out of the schools - young brats spoiled with all manner of gadgets of instant communication and computing, thinking that they possess the power of gods, but in reality having the manners of rotten little wimps who aren't getting their way. In the meantime, unborn babies are being murdered, children the world over are starving, and the elderly are being shoved out of the way in the greedy rush for "me, me, me." This is height of hubris and the culmination of godless liberal Democracy - two wolves and one sheep voting on what's for dinner.

Occupy Adoration

"Our own belief is that the renovation of the world will be brought about only by the Holy Eucharist" - Pope Leo XIII, born 2 March, 1810, at Carpineto; elected Pope 20 February, 1878; died 20 July, 1903, at Rome.

A Deeper Examination of the Moral Dimensions within the Vatican's Recent Paper

Folks,

Yesterday we discussed in blog post "Church Liberals Strike Again" a paper from the Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace on the Global Economy entitled:

Towards Reforming the International Financial and Monetary Systems in the Context of Global Public Authority

Below are some further thoughts on the moral dimensions to what this paper states. Quotes from the paper are in italicized text and commentary in un-italicized text.

The economic and financial crisis which the world is going through calls everyone, individuals and peoples, to examine in depth the principles and the cultural and moral values at the basis of social coexistence.

In other words, principle, culture and morality are the foundation of social coexistence. If these are NOT fundamentally Christian, then civilization world-wide will and must fail.

The Pontiff asserted that the defence of life and the promotion of people’s cultural and moral development are the essential conditions for the promotion of authentic development. On these grounds, Paul VI said that full and global development is “the new name of peace”.

There is no lasting economic development without protecting life from conception onwards. A society that murders its unborn is a society that does not deserve to continue. The individual right to life, including and especially the unborn's, is true Christian culture and morality, the underpinings of any lasting economic success.

In his social encyclical, Benedict XVI precisely identified the roots of a crisis that is not only economic and financial but above all moral in nature. In fact, as the Pontiff notes, to function correctly the economy needs ethics; and not just of any kind but one that is people-centred.

Morality is basic and fundamental, centered on and promoting the individual right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. An immoral society is one that murders its unborn and sanctifies the godless filth of homosexuality. These are crimes that destroy the family (society's basic building block). They are crimes against humanity. As long as a society commits crimes such as these, it is anti-life, anti-liberty, and anti-family. Thus is that society doomed to follow ancient Rome into oblivion.

The lack of a convinced consensus, nourished by an unceasing moral communion on the part of the world community, would also reduce the effectiveness of such an Authority.

The world community lacks morality (it always has and it always will until Jesus Christ returns in all His glory), so any economic measures it devises to redress the current crisis are doomed to fail.

Under the current uncertainties, in a society capable of mobilizing immense means but whose cultural and moral reflection is still inadequate with regard to their use in achieving the appropriate ends, we are invited to not give in and to build above all a meaningful future for the generations to come.

In spite of the fact that civilization is, if not intrinsically immoral, at least amoral, we as Christians must never give in to despair. No matter what, the will of God will be done. Atheists, agnostics, secularists, humanists, liberals, progressives and Democrats cannot stop God's will. In fact, the more they try to stop it, the greater will be the success of God's will.

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Church Liberals Strike Again

Folks,

The Pontifical Council for Justice and Peace on the Global Economy recently issued a study entitled:

Towards Reforming the International Financial and Monetary Systems in the Context of Global Public Authority

Please read this article by left clicking your mouse cursor on the aforementioned hyperlinked title. The liberal nit wits are using this as a rallying cry for international socialism. The very thing they ignore is the moral dimension to what this statement says, with the pertinent excerpts below:

The economic and financial crisis which the world is going through calls everyone, individuals and peoples, to examine in depth the principles and the cultural and moral values at the basis of social coexistence.

The Pontiff asserted that the defence of life and the promotion of people’s cultural and moral development are the essential conditions for the promotion of authentic development. On these grounds, Paul VI said that full and global development is “the new name of peace”.

In his social encyclical, Benedict XVI precisely identified the roots of a crisis that is not only economic and financial but above all moral in nature. In fact, as the Pontiff notes, to function correctly the economy needs ethics; and not just of any kind but one that is people-centred.

The lack of a convinced consensus, nourished by an unceasing moral communion on the part of the world community, would also reduce the effectiveness of such an Authority.

Under the current uncertainties, in a society capable of mobilizing immense means but whose cultural and moral reflection is still inadequate with regard to their use in achieving the appropriate ends, we are invited to not give in and to build above all a meaningful future for the generations to come.


Michael Voris of Real Catholic TV discusses the document here: Church Liberals Strike Again

Catawissa Gazetteer also has a commentary on the same: The Pope Calls for One World Government? In Your Dreams, Mr. Marx.

The Market Ticker likewise has relevant commentary: The Holy See Gets It (Mostly) Right

The discerning reader will quickly see that what the Church is calling for isn't socialism, but a restoration of our moral foundation so necessary to the building of a viable economy, and of an equitable distribution of work and wealth. Neither the fleabaggers on Wall Street nor their Democrat Party instigators want any of that.

Losing Liberty - Occupy Wall Street Lacks Positive Solutions

Folks,

What follows is commentary from the Harvard Crimson on the fleabaggers who comprise the OWS movement. The writer concludes, "The quickest way to fix the system is to elect a government humble enough to let each individual succeed, or fail, on his own merit." This is exactly what the godless liberal Democrats do NOT want, and certainly not what the overwhelming majority of useless fleabaggers waving communist flags and sporting socialist placards want - personal responsibility and accountability.

Losing Liberty - Occupy Wall Street Lacks Positive Solutions

Like the Tea Party, the Occupy Wall Street movement began out of a growing sense of frustration with the way society seems to operate. And this is where similarities between the movements end. The Tea Party had clear goals: lower taxes, shrink inefficient and burdensome portions of government, and allow individuals and private entrepreneurs to flourish. The Occupy movement, on the other hand, seems to be united against the “greed” of the one percent for the ironic reason that they want more. The protestors have a right to be frustrated with the current system, but their demands reveal a profound disrespect for freedom and ignorance of the real culprits in America’s “rigged” system.

Last week, pollster for former President Clinton, Douglas E. Schoen, published the results of the first poll of the movement. After interviewing hundreds of protestors, his firm found that, “what binds a large majority of the protestors together . . . is a deep commitment to left-wing policies: opposition to free-market capitalism and support for radical redistribution of wealth, intense regulation of the private sector, and protectionist policies.” Given their obsession with the belief in representing the 99 percent, their agenda appears to be nothing less the dissolving of income inequality in the United States, Yet the protestors have identified no way to accomplish this by increasing the wealth of the 99 percent. To the contrary, in lockstep with Obama, the movement supports forcing the one percent to become part of the 99 percent instead of the other way around.

Americans used to deny people rights unjustly based on race, religion, and sex. Today, the Occupy Wall Street Movement with the support of Democratic leaders seeks to trample on income minorities. Their claim is that what’s yours should not be yours because it should be mine. An endorsement of the OWS movement in The Nation, the self-proclaimed “flagship of the left,” stated, among other things, that “private ownership corrupts democracy” and governments should “focus on public goods . . . rather than on private liberty and personal property.” Clearly, then, the Occupy Wall Street movement and its Democratic supporters have shifted the progressive movement radically to the left, placing the organization of the state above the free decisions of its citizens. They scream for the equality of wealth and then do everything possible to shred equality of liberty. It fulfills what de Tocqueville predicted more than a century earlier, “Democracy extends the sphere of individual freedom; socialism restricts it. Democracy attaches all possible value to each man; socialism makes each man a mere agent, a mere number.”

To give the movement some credit, the latest crisis displayed clearly that the current system is broken. The problem is that the current system is not based on capitalism and free enterprise but government coercion. To give one example, Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission Member Peter J. Wallison noted in his dissent from the report of the majority of the commission, “the sine qua non of the financial crisis was U.S. government housing policy, which led to the creation of 27 million subprime and other risky loans—half of all mortgages in the United States.” Through legislation passed by Congress during the 1990s, the government required Fannie, Freddie and later regulated private banks to reduce mortgage-underwriting standards. The subprime mortgage bubble existed only in the United States not because of universal greed but because of U.S. government policy. Wall Street was far from blameless, but the root cause of the entire collapse was a misguided U.S. policy designed to give the less fortunate homes they couldn’t afford.

We all have the inalienable rights of life, liberty and pursuit of happiness because we are human; governments do not provide them, but they can prevent us from obtaining them. To forsake liberty for the sake of equality is to give the government unlimited power as the great distributor, and, as Hayek argued in The [MMS1] Road to Serfdom, “in this way a democracy may set up the most complete despotism imaginable.” Conservatives believe in society because they believe in the creative power of millions of individuals that make up this truly exceptional nation. When the government rejects the individual for the so-called expertise of regulators, things fall apart. Agreeing to hate the one percent who pay 38 percent of income taxes accomplishes nothing, and sacrificing liberty will only take the nation to serfdom. If the Occupy movement truly wants to be the source of positive change in the United States, it should join the Tea Party and occupy government. The quickest way to fix the system is to elect a government humble enough to let each individual succeed, or fail, on his own merit.

Derek J. Bekebrede ’13 is an economics concentrator in Winthrop House. His column appears on alternate Tuesdays.

Do NOT Donate to Susan G. Komen Foundation

Folks,

I am sadden to report that my current employer is promoting donations to the Susan G. Komen Foundation which is an overt and proud supporter of the largest murder-for-hire organization in these United States - Planned Parenthood. While giving to charitable works that seek a cure for breast cancer is laudable, the fact of the matter is that much of the money donated to the Susan G. Komen Foundation goes to Planned Parenthood. That organization in turn is the largest murderer of unborn babies in this country. What is so ironic is that abortion increases dramatically a woman's chances of having breast cancer in the first place, the disease which the Susan G. Komen Foundation is purportedly fightly against. I do not know how to fight this scourge in my current place of employment. But I do know that the word must go out. Therefore, please left click your mouse cursor on the hyperlinked titles below to read reports from Lifesite News and elsewhere on this important issue.

Behind The Pink Ribbon: Komen’s Ties With Planned Parenthood
Abortion-Breast Cancer Link

What Happens When a Republic Degenerates into a Democracy?

Folks,

My friend Catawissa Gazetteer posted on Facebook a link to the following essay which describes what happens when a Republic degenerates into a Democracy.

Surviving in Argentina: And So It Ends for Argentina

The example is (obviously) Argentina. There are historical precedents, some ancient, for this. The "peepul's" demand for a king like the other nations in 1st Samuel chapter 8 is one example. That always reminds me of how the "peepul" in these United States in 2008 wanted a President like the other nations in Europe, and boy oh boy did we every get one. The mob crying "Crucifige eum, crucifige eum!" in the courtyard of Pontius Pilate is another example. Here the "peepul" demanded the release of "Barabbas" whose name means "son of the father" in the place of Yeshua, the Son of the Father. So the "peepul" got the son of that father whom they worshipped - satan. In the case of Argentina, however, the elected antichrist isn't a man, but a woman. And the Argentinians are held up by the popular news media as the example of modernism and open mindedness and sophistication because they have a woman leader. Il Duce or La Duca - truly what is the difference? Read on now, dear reader, at the blogsite essay linked above and learn what Obamania and national Democracy leads to, for the other side of the coin whose head is Democracy is Socialism - in this case, National Socialism for National Democracy. Can you spell "Nazi?"

One day Jesus Christ will return to this Earth and end all Democracy once and for all. "From His mouth comes a sharp sword, so that with it He may strike down the nations, and He will rule them with a rod of iron; and He treads the wine press of the fierce wrath of God, the Almighty." Revelation 19:15.

Buckle up, folks, for Argentina is about to get a prelude of that wrath as God lets Cristina Fernández de Kirchner do her worst.

"But I have this against you, that you tolerate that woman Jezebel, who calls herself a prophetess and is teaching and seducing my servants to practice sexual immorality and to eat food sacrificed to idols. I gave her time to repent, but she refuses to repent of her sexual immorality. Behold, I will throw her onto a sickbed, and those who commit adultery with her I will throw into great tribulation, unless they repent of her works, and I will strike her children dead. And all the churches will know that I am he who searches mind and heart, and I will give to each of you according to your works." Revelation 2:20-23.

Monday, October 24, 2011

Sunday Homily on Matthew 22 - No More Dialogue

Folks,

This Sunday saw an overlap in the Scripture Readings between the 1928 Book of Common Prayer (BCP) and the Missale Romanum.

The readings in the 1928 BCP for the Eighteenth Sunday after Trinity included 1st Corinthians 1:4-8a and Matthew 22:34-46.

The readings for the Thirtieth Sunday in Ordinary Time - Year A in the Missale Romanum included Exodus 22:20-26; Psalm 18:2-4, 47, 51; 1st Thessalonians 1:5c-10; and Matthew 22:34-40.

The overlap existed in the Gospel reading. Whereas the Anglican reading included the entire text from verse 34 to 46 in chapter 22 of the Gospel of Matthew, the Roman reading included only verses 34 through 40.

Now at St. Ann's Catholic Church on Saturday evening there was a visiting priest who performed the Mass and gave the homily. The Old Testament reading from Exodus 22:20-26 began with the exhortation, "You shall not molest or oppress an alien, for you were once aliens yourselves in the land of Egypt." So the homily consisted of the obligatory remarks about immigration. The visiting priest gave a story of how a company in New Orleans assigned cleanup work after hurricane Katrina hired illegal aliens. At the end of their work assignment, instead of paying them, the company turned them over to Immigration Services to be deported back to Mexico. I assume in all this we were supposed to feel sad for the immigrants for having been unjustly treated and angry with the company for not hiding their illegal status. The whole point that illegal immigration enslaves the immigrant was completely missed on the priest. Rather, we were made to believe that loving our neighbor as ourselves (from the Gospel reading in Matthew) means we should ignore illegal immigration. That wasn't said outright, but that certainly was the taste left in my mouth. The entire point of the Gospel reading was missed completely. One cannot claim to love God with all one's heart and one's neighbor as one's self when one aids and abets a system which enslaves immigrants to an illegal status and wages below the level of subsistence. The cure is stopping illegal immigration and punishing any who encourage it. I have often wondered why when I was working for a different nuclear energy employer than currently, those employees who came from Nigeria or Iraq had to go through hell and back to get their legal status to work, but it's perfectly OK for a lilly white rich family (like those of liberal Democrat politicians) to keep in enslavement Mexican workers, deporting them at a moments notice. I will end this part of the discussion by pointing out that it is illegal immigration which exploits and oppresses Hispanics trying to find work in the United States, and it is our own laziness in refusing jobs that they are willing to take which exacerbates this situation.

Nevertheless, I am thankful to note that the sermon at St. Philip the Evangelist Orthodox Anglican Church was entirely different. First, a visting priest (Canon Paul) also came to gave the homily. Second, the entire Gospel passage from verses 34 through 46 in chapter 22 of Matthew were read in whole and in context. Third, the Gospel was preached, NOT social justice nonsense. I will try to recollect as faithfully as possible what was expounded (and segregate my personal notes from what was said). I am hoping that a video will soon be available at either of the following links:

Charlotte Anglican
The Anglican Priest's Channel

Canon Paul explained how chapter 22 in the Gospel of Matthew was the last time that Jesus spoke WITH the opposition. This is the point where he cut off dialogue and after this chapter began speaking TO (not WITH) the opposition. In chapter 22, Jesus speaks WITH:

  • The people about the Wedding Banquet at the End of Time (verses 1 through 14)
  • The Pharisees about the Proper Relationship between God and Caesar (verses 15 through 22)
  • The Sadducees about the Resurrection from the Dead (verses 23 through 33)
  • The Pharisees about the Greatest Commandment and the Messiah being David's Son (verses 34 through 46)

But afterwards He speaks TO and AT them, for Canon Paul pointed out something very significant in verse 34: "But when the Pharisees heard that Jesus had silenced the Sadducees, they gathered themselves together." The root of the word used for "silenced" in the Greek is φιμόω which sounds like phimoo and means "to muzzle." Jesus muzzled the Sadducees - the deniers of the Resurrection of the Dead - when He told them that the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob (all of whom were dead) is God of the living, NOT the dead. There was no more dialogue to be had. This wasn't a Democracy where someone else's opinion carried any weight. Eternal Truth had spoken and that was it.

So as Canon Paul correctly described it, the Pharisees gathered togther, having heard and seen what Jesus did to muzzle the Sadducees. Now the Greek word for "gathered together" comes from the root συνάγω which when pronounced sounds like "synago," a diminutive for "synagogue." You see, there were two places where Jews of first century Palestine met to pray and worship: the synogogue for weekly Sabbath meetings, and the Temple that King Herod had built, which was used for the principle Jewish Feasts and sacrifices throughout the year. Jesus had muzzled the Temple, and now He was going to muzzle the synagogue. I am not sure that this is the exact point that Canon Paul was trying to make, but it certainly is consistent with the Greek text as he explained it.

So an expert in the law from the Pharisees asks Jesus what the Greatest Commandment is and He quotes from Deuteronomy 6:5 - love God with all your heart, mind, soul and strength. Then he adds the Second Greatest from Leviticus 19:18 which His detractors avoided - love your neighbor as yourself. (Notice how the first Commandment in directing our attention to God the Father is vertical and the second Commandment in directing our attention to our neighbor is horizontal: here we have the beams of the Cross.)

[NOTE: Now to all those bleeding heart liberals out there in cyber space, Jesus never told Caesar - that is to say, nanny government - to love one's neighbor as one's self; rather, He told you and me to do that. This isn't the gospel of wealth redistribution, but rather the Gospel of conversion and repentance, personal responsibility and accountability which yesterday's Pharisees and today's liberals and socialists avoid at all costs.]

And right afterwards, Jesus in verses 41 through 45 queries the Pharisees who had asked the question in the first place. He asked from Psalm 110 whose Son is the Messiah (to which the Pharisees responded by saying King David's Son) and how then the Messiah could be King David's Lord? Can the Messiah be Lord of His father when He is his Son? Verse 46 tells us, "No one was able to answer Him a word, nor did anyone dare from that day on to ask Him another question." These were weighty questions for weak minds, just like today.

There was no more dialogue, no more discussion, no more Democracy. Truth had spoken, the Temple and the synagogue were muzzled, and now the "peepul" would be spoken to and at, not with. Canon Paul explained how this progressed through the subsequent three chapters:

  • Chapter 23 in Matthew recounts what Jesus said about the Pharisees and their hypocrisy (not unlike the hypocritical clerics of social justice and the common good today - that's my note, not Canon Paul's)
  • Chapter 24 recounts what Jesus said about the destruction of the Temple and the end times
  • Chapter 25 recounts what Jesus said about the coming Day of Judgment when all dialogue is ended and we shall everyone of us stand before our Creator

For this the "peepul" murdered the Messiah, crying in the courtyard of Pontius Pilate, "Crucifige eum, crucifige eum!" I found much relevancy in this sermon to what is happening around us. Now bear in mind that these are my thoughts, NOT Canon Paul's. We are nearing if not at the point of ending dialogue with the abortionists, the militant homosexual activitists, the socialists, the liberals, the Democrats, etc. They are adamant in their greed, covetousness, sexual perversions, idolatry and murder (yes, abortion IS murder). Fleabaggers on Wall Street, in other cities throughout the nation, and overseas, too, carry their flags of socialism and cry that same cry heard two millenia ago:  "Crucifige eum, crucifige eum!" Sadly, too many Roman priests and bishops simply can't see the blindingly obvious in front of their faces any longer. That is regretable, for to them has been given the task of carrying the Church forth. If they won't do God's bidding, then God will raise up sons to Abraham from the stones themselves (Matthew 3:7-12).

Honkies for Herman

Folks,

A friend posted this bumber sticker on Facebook. Yes, I know that Herman Cain recently flubbed his responses on the issue of abortion during an interview, but he did clarify his stance that he is solidly pro-life. So far, everything I have seen demonstrates that this is a man of integrity. Therefore, this "honkie" supports Herman Cain. That doesn't mean I don't like Rick Santorum, Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann or the other Republican candidates. But Herman Cain winning the primary (with perhaps Michele Bachmann as his running mate) would be just enough to throw the liberal news commentators on NBC into terminal fits of apoplexy.

Pope Leo XIII On Socialism - Quod Apostolici Muneris

Folks,

Within the comboxes to this blogsite, a supporter of the fleabaggers insists on the eradication of capitalism and the institution of world socialism because in his view that is the way by which we can set up God's Kingdom here on Earth. The hubris implicit in that assumption is the very same hubris with which the serpent tempted Eve to partake of the forbidden fruit: "God doesn't want you to eat the fruit because if you do, then you'll be like Him - a god determining right from wrong!" He assumes that man can and should do what God alone can and will do. He refuses to acknowledge either 2nd Chronicles 7:14 or Matthew 6:33 - righteousness and holiness come before social justice, never afterwards.

Pope Leo XIII speaks further on socialism in his encyclical, "Quod Apostolici Muneris." The bottom line is this: one cannot be a Christian and be socialist. One may, however, be an honest entrepreneur (i.e., capitalist) and be Christian. That doesn't mean that all capitalists are Christian; rather it means that authentically Christian men and women will not be socialist (except perhaps out of ignorance). Socialism makes government god, and the results of that are a hundred million murdered under Soviet and Chinese "world" socialism, and tens of millions under Hitler's national socialism. Today corporate socialism (otherwise known as crony capitalism which is actually no capitalism at all) has murdered 60 million unborn babies in these United States since Roe v Wade became the defacto law of the land in 1973. Our liberal detractor against free enterprise would have us, however, bleed purple koolaide for the poor in Thailand while we ignore the tortured and dismembered unborn babies in our own nation. Until we repent of abortion, homosexual filth, and the putrid rot of idolatry and sexual promiscuity, we deserve no social justice and no common good. As Galatians 6:7-8 states, "Be not deceived; God is not mocked: for whatsoever a man soweth, that shall he also reap. For he that soweth to his flesh shall of the flesh reap corruption; but he that soweth to the Spirit shall of the Spirit reap life everlasting." Indeed, for crimes like ours was King Manasseh of Judah led away into captivity by a ring through his nose (2nd Kings 21, 2nd Chronicles 33). The children of Israel and Judah got their social justice: Assyria deporting the northern kingdom into captivity and Babylonia the southern kingdom.

QUOD APOSTOLICI MUNERIS (On Socialism)
Pope Leo XIII

Encyclical of Pope Leo XIII promulgated on 28 December 1878.

To the Patriarchs, Primates, Archbishops, and Bishops of the Catholic World in Grace and Communion with the Apostolic See.

At the very beginning of Our pontificate, as the nature of Our apostolic office demanded, we hastened to point out in an encyclical letter addressed to you, venerable brethren, the deadly plague that is creeping into the very fibers of human society and leading it on to the verge of destruction; at the same time We pointed out also the most effectual remedies by which society might be restored and might escape from the very serious dangers which threaten it. But the evils which We then deplored have so rapidly increased that We are again compelled to address you, as though we heard the voice of the prophet ringing in Our ears: "Cry, cease not, lift up thy voice like a trumpet."1 You understand, venerable brethren, that We speak of that sect of men who, under various and almost barbarous names, are called socialists, communists, or nihilists, and who, spread over all the world, and bound together by the closest ties in a wicked confederacy, no longer seek the shelter of secret meetings, but, openly and boldly marching forth in the light of day, strive to bring to a head what they have long been planning—the overthrow of all civil society whatsoever.

Surely these are they who, as the sacred Scriptures testify, "Defile the flesh, despise dominion and blaspheme majesty."2 They leave nothing untouched or whole which by both human and divine laws has been wisely decreed for the health and beauty of life. They refuse obedience to the higher powers, to whom, according to the admonition of the Apostle, every soul ought to be subject, and who derive the right of governing from God; and they proclaim the absolute equality of all men in rights and duties. They debase the natural union of man and woman, which is held sacred even among barbarous peoples; and its bond, by which the family is chiefly held together, they weaken, or even deliver up to lust. Lured, in fine, by the greed of present goods, which is "the root of all evils which some coveting have erred from the faith,"3 they assail the right of property sanctioned by natural law; and by a scheme of horrible wickedness, while they seem desirous of caring for the needs and satisfying the desires of all men, they strive to seize and hold in common whatever has been acquired either by title of lawful inheritance, or by labor of brain and hands, or by thrift in one's mode of life. These are the startling theories they utter in their meetings, set forth in their pamphlets, and scatter abroad in a cloud of journals and tracts. Wherefore, the revered majesty and power of kings has won such fierce hatred from their seditious people that disloyal traitors, impatient of all restraint, have more than once within a short period raised their arms in impious attempt against the lives of their own sovereigns.

2. But the boldness of these bad men, which day by day more and more threatens civil society with destruction, and strikes the souls of all with anxiety and fear, finds its cause and origin in those poisonous doctrines which, spread abroad in former times among the people, like evil seed bore in due time such fatal fruit. For you know, venerable brethren, that that most deadly war which from the sixteenth century down has been waged by innovators against the Catholic faith, and which has grown in intensity up to today, had for its object to subvert all revelation, and overthrow the supernatural order, that thus the way might be opened for the discoveries, or rather the hallucinations, of reason alone. This kind of error, which falsely usurps to itself the name of reason, as it lures and whets the natural appetite that is in man of excelling, and gives loose rein to unlawful desires of every kind, has easily penetrated not only the minds of a great multitude of men but to a wide extent civil society, also. Hence, by a new species of impiety, unheard of even among the heathen nations, states have been constituted without any count at all of God or of the order established by him; it has been given out that public authority neither derives its principles, nor its majesty, nor its power of governing from God, but rather from the multitude, which, thinking itself absolved from all divine sanction, bows only to such laws as it shall have made at its own will. The supernatural truths of faith having been assailed and cast out as though hostile to reason, the very Author and Redeemer of the human race has been slowly and little by little banished from the universities, the Lyceums and gymnasia—in a word, from every public institution. In fine, the rewards and punishments of a future and eternal life having been handed over to oblivion, the ardent desire of happiness has been limited to the bounds of the present. Such doctrines as these having been scattered far and wide, so great a license of thought and action having sprung up on all sides, it is no matter for surprise that men of the lowest class, weary of their wretched home or workshop, are eager to attack the homes and fortunes of the rich; it is no matter for surprise that already there exists no sense of security either in public or private life, and that the human race should have advanced to the very verge of final dissolution.

3. But the supreme pastors of the Church, on whom the duty falls of guarding the Lord's flock from the snares of the enemy, have striven in time to ward off the danger and provide for the safety of the faithful. For, as soon as the secret societies began to be formed, in whose bosom the seeds of the errors which we have already mentioned were even then being nourished, the Roman Pontiffs Clement XII and Benedict XIV did not fail to unmask the evil counsels of the sects, and to warn the faithful of the whole globe against the ruin which would be wrought. Later on again, when a licentious sort of liberty was attributed to man by a set of men who gloried in the name of philosophers,4 and a new right, as they call it, against the natural and divine law began to be framed and sanctioned, Pope Pius VI, of happy memory, at once exposed in public documents the guile and falsehood of their doctrines, and at the same time foretold with apostolic foresight the ruin into which the people so miserably deceived would be dragged. But, as no adequate precaution was taken to prevent their evil teachings from leading the people more and more astray, and lest they should be allowed to escape in the public statutes of States, Popes Pius VII and Leo XII condemned by anathema the secret sects,5 and again warned society of the danger which threatened them. Finally, all have witnessed with what solemn words and great firmness and constancy of soul our glorious predecessor, Pius IX, of happy memory, both in his allocutions and in his encyclical letters addressed to the bishops of all the world, fought now against the wicked attempts of the sects, now openly by name against the pest of socialism, which was already making headway.

4. But it is to be lamented that those to whom has been committed the guardianship of the public weal, deceived by the wiles of wicked men and terrified by their threats, have looked upon the Church with a suspicious and even hostile eye, not perceiving that the attempts of the sects would be vain if the doctrine of the Catholic Church and the authority of the Roman Pontiffs had always survived, with the honor that belongs to them, among princes and peoples. For, "the church of the living God, which is the pillar and ground of truth,"6 hands down those doctrines and precepts whose special object is the safety and peace of society and the uprooting of the evil growth of socialism.

5. For, indeed, although the socialists, stealing the very Gospel itself with a view to deceive more easily the unwary, have been accustomed to distort it so as to suit their own purposes, nevertheless so great is the difference between their depraved teachings and the most pure doctrine of Christ that none greater could exist: "for what participation hath justice with injustice or what fellowship hath light with darkness?"7 Their habit, as we have intimated, is always to maintain that nature has made all men equal, and that, therefore, neither honor nor respect is due to majesty, nor obedience to laws, unless, perhaps, to those sanctioned by their own good pleasure. But, on the contrary, in accordance with the teachings of the Gospel, the equality of men consists in this: that all, having inherited the same nature, are called to the same most high dignity of the sons of God, and that, as one and the same end is set before all, each one is to be judged by the same law and will receive punishment or reward according to his deserts. The inequality of rights and of power proceeds from the very Author of nature, "from whom all paternity in heaven and earth is named."8 But the minds of princes and their subjects are, according to Catholic doctrine and precepts, bound up one with the other in such a manner, by mutual duties and rights, that the thirst for power is restrained and the rational ground of obedience made easy, firm, and noble.

6. Assuredly, the Church wisely inculcates the apostolic precept on the mass of men: "There is no power but from God; and those that are, are ordained of God. Therefore he that resisteth the power resisteth the ordinance of God. And they that resist purchase to themselves damnation." And again she admonishes those "subject by necessity" to be so "not only for wrath but also for conscience' sake," and to render "to all men their dues; tribute to whom tribute is due, custom to whom custom, fear to whom fear, honor to whom honor."9 For, He who created and governs all things has, in His wise providence, appointed that the things which are lowest should attain their ends by those which are intermediate, and these again by the highest. Thus, as even in the kingdom of heaven He hath willed that the choirs of angels be distinct and some subject to others, and also in the Church has instituted various orders and a diversity of offices, so that all are not apostles or doctors or pastors,10 so also has He appointed that there should be various orders in civil society, differing indignity, rights, and power, whereby the State, like the Church, should be one body, consisting of many members, some nobler than others, but all necessary to each other and solicitous for the common good.

7. But that rulers may use the power conceded to them to save and not to destroy, the Church of Christ seasonably warns even princes that the sentence of the Supreme Judge overhangs them, and, adopting the words of divine wisdom, calls upon all in the name of God: "Give ear, you that rule the people, and that please yourselves in multitudes of nations; for power is given you by the Lord, and strength by the Most High, who will examine your works, and search out your thoughts.... For a most severe judgment shall be for them that bear rule.... For God will not except any man's person, neither will he stand in awe of any man's greatness, for he hath made the little and the great; and he hath equally care of all. But a greater punishment is ready for the more mighty."11 And if at any time it happen that the power of the State is rashly and tyrannically wielded by princes, the teaching of the Catholic church does not allow an insurrection on private authority against them, lest public order be only the more disturbed, and lest society take greater hurt therefrom. And when affairs come to such a pass that there is no other hope of safety, she teaches that relief may be hastened by the merits of Christian patience and by earnest prayers to God. But, if the will of legislators and princes shall have sanctioned or commanded anything repugnant to the divine or natural law, the dignity and duty of the Christian name, as well as the judgment of the Apostle, urge that "God is to be obeyed rather than man."12

8. Even family life itself, which is the cornerstone of all society and government, necessarily feels and experiences the salutary power of the Church, which redounds to the right ordering and preservation of every State and kingdom. For you know, venerable brethren, that the foundation of this society rests first of all in the indissoluble union of man and wife according to the necessity of natural law, and is completed in the mutual rights and duties of parents and children, masters and servants. You know also that the doctrines of socialism strive almost completely to dissolve this union; since, that stability which is imparted to it by religious wedlock being lost, it follows that the power of the father over his own children, and the duties of the children toward their parents, must be greatly weakened. But the Church, on the contrary, teaches that "marriage, honorable in all,"13 which God himself instituted in the very beginning of the world, and made indissoluble for the propagation and preservation of the human species, has become still more binding and more holy through Christ, who raised it to the dignity of a sacrament, and chose to use it as the figure of His own union with the Church.

Wherefore, as the Apostle has it,14 as Christ is the head of the Church, so is the man the head of the woman; and as the Church is subject to Christ, who embraces her with a most chaste and undying love, so also should wives be subject to their husbands, and be loved by them in turn with a faithful and constant affection. In like manner does the Church temper the use of parental and domestic authority, that it may tend to hold children and servants to their duty, without going beyond bounds. For, according to Catholic teaching, the authority of our heavenly Father and Lord is imparted to parents and masters, whose authority, therefore, not only takes its origin and force from Him, but also borrows its nature and character. Hence, the Apostle exhorts children to "obey their parents in the Lord, and honor their father and mother, which is the first commandment with promise";15 and he admonishes parents: "And you, fathers, provoke not your children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and correction of the Lord."16 Again, the apostle enjoins the divine precept on servants and masters, exhorting the former to be "obedient to their lords according to the flesh of Christ . . . with a good will serving, as to the Lord"; and the latter, to "forbear threatenings, knowing that the Lord of all is in heaven, and there is no respect of persons with God."17 If only all these matters were faithfully observed according to the divine will by all on whom they are enjoined, most assuredly every family would be a figure of the heavenly home, and the wonderful blessings there begotten would not confine themselves to the households alone, but would scatter their riches abroad through the nations.

9. But Catholic wisdom, sustained by the precepts of natural and divine law, provides with especial care for public and private tranquillity in its doctrines and teachings regarding the duty of government and the distribution of the goods which are necessary for life and use. For, while the socialists would destroy the "right" of property, alleging it to be a human invention altogether opposed to the inborn equality of man, and, claiming a community of goods, argue that poverty should not be peaceably endured, and that the property and privileges of the rich may be rightly invaded, the Church, with much greater wisdom and good sense, recognizes the inequality among men, who are born with different powers of body and mind, inequality in actual possession, also, and holds that the right of property and of ownership, which springs from nature itself, must not be touched and stands inviolate. For she knows that stealing and robbery were forbidden in so special a manner by God, the Author and Defender of right, that He would not allow man even to desire what belonged to another, and that thieves and despoilers, no less than adulterers and idolaters, are shut out from the Kingdom of Heaven. But not the less on this account does our holy Mother not neglect the care of the poor or omit to provide for their necessities; but, rather, drawing them to her with a mother's embrace, and knowing that they bear the person of Christ Himself, who regards the smallest gift to the poor as a benefit conferred on Himself, holds them in great honor. She does all she can to help them; she provides homes and hospitals where they may be received, nourished, and cared for all the world over and watches over these. She is constantly pressing on the rich that most grave precept to give what remains to the poor; and she holds over their heads the divine sentence that unless they succor the needy they will be repaid by eternal torments. In fine, she does all she can to relieve and comfort the poor, either by holding up to them the example of Christ, "who being rich became poor for our sake,18 or by reminding them of his own words, wherein he pronounced the poor blessed and bade them hope for the reward of eternal bliss. But who does not see that this is the best method of arranging the old struggle between the rich and poor? For, as the very evidence of facts and events shows, if this method is rejected or disregarded, one of two things must occur: either the greater portion of the human race will fall back into the vile condition of slavery which so long prevailed among the pagan nations, or human society must continue to be disturbed by constant eruptions, to be disgraced by rapine and strife, as we have had sad witness even in recent times.

10. These things being so, then, venerable brethren, as at the beginning of Our pontificate We, on whom the guidance of the whole Church now lies, pointed out a place of refuge to the peoples and the princes tossed about by the fury of the tempest, so now, moved by the extreme peril that is on them, We again lift up Our voice, and beseech them again and again for their own safety's sake as well as that of their people to welcome and give ear to the Church which has had such wonderful influence on the public prosperity of kingdoms, and to recognize that political and religious affairs are so closely united that what is taken from the spiritual weakens the loyalty of subjects and the majesty of the government. And since they know that the Church of Christ has such power to ward off the plague of socialism as cannot be found in human laws, in the mandates of magistrates, or in the force of armies, let them restore that Church to the condition and liberty in which she may exert her healing force for the benefit of all society.

11. But you, venerable brethren, who know the origin and the drift of these gathering evils, strive with all your force of soul to implant the Catholic teaching deep in the minds of all. Strive that all may have the habit of clinging to God with filial love and revering His divinity from their tenderest years; that they may respect the majesty of princes and of laws; that they may restrain their passions and stand fast by the order which God has established in civil and domestic society. Moreover, labor hard that the children of the Catholic Church neither join nor favor in any way whatsoever this abominable sect; let them show, on the contrary, by noble deeds and right dealing in all things, how well and happily human society would hold together were each member to shine as an example of right doing and of virtue. In fine, as the recruits of socialism are especially sought among artisans and workmen, who, tired, perhaps, of labor, are more easily allured by the hope of riches and the promise of wealth, it is well to encourage societies of artisans and workmen which, constituted under the guardianship of religion, may tend to make all associates contented with their lot and move them to a quiet and peaceful life.

12. Venerable brethren, may He who is the beginning and end of every good work inspire your and Our endeavors. And, indeed, the very thought of these days, in which the anniversary of our Lord's birth is solemnly observed, moves us to hope for speedy help. For the new life which Christ at His birth brought to a world already aging and steeped in the very depths of wickedness He bids us also to hope for, and the peace which He then announced by the angels to men He has promised to us also. For the Lord's "hand is not shortened that he cannot save, neither is his ear heavy that he cannot hear."19 In these most auspicious days, then, faithful of your churches, We earnestly pray the Giver of all good that again "there may appear unto men the goodness and kindness of God our Saviour,"20 who brought us out of the power of our most deadly enemy into the most noble dignity of the sons of God. And that We may the sooner and more fully gain our wish, do you, venerable brethren, join with Us in lifting up your fervent prayers to God and beg the intercession of the Blessed and Immaculate Virgin Mary, and of Joseph her spouse, and of the blessed Apostles Peter and Paul, in whose prayers We have the greatest confidence. And in the meanwhile We impart to you, with the inmost affection of the heart, and to your clergy and faithful people, the apostolic benediction as an augury of the divine gifts.

Given at St. Peter's, in Rome, on the twenty-eighth day of December, 1878, in the first year of Our pontificate.